The Raw Milk Debate
Last August, came across a newspaper article reminding me
of concerns I have had for many years. A
few years ago for numerous reasons, I stopped drinking milk. This may be an old
debate but I believe it is time to revisit the Raw milk debate.
We accuse today's processed milk of causing
everything from allergies to heart disease. Before WWII, we bought all our
dairy products fresh, raw milk, buttermilk, luscious, naturally yellow butter, and
fresh farm cheeses. Diseases such as allergies and heart problems were rare. There
was, however, potential danger of harmful bacteria, which perhaps justified the
scientific involvement. Modern refrigeration methods have solved this problem
so why do we continually need to modify the raw milk? A good supply of high quality dairy products is
vital to our health and the economic well being of us all. But I wonder why we
need to continually add chemicals to the once raw milk. Isn’t this natural
state better for us?
New York Times article in August, 2007 stated that
the sale of raw milk for human consumption is
illegal in 15 states. In 26 states, it can be bought with restrictions.
Users choose raw milk because, like raw cheese, the taste is preferable.
The taste is more complex with a richness and density. Advocates attribute
stronger immune and better digestive systems to raw milk. Another argument
comes from the philosophy that we should treat their bodies and the planet
properly.
While taste is a good argument, I think that caring for our body and the
planet are key arguments for making raw milk readily available to those who
desire it. Why can’t we combine the two worlds,
reduce bacteria and retain strong immune and digestive systems.


Comments